Skip to content
Generative AI Development

Generative AI Development Services

Codroon provides generative AI development services that put working AI features inside your product. Not demos, not pilots that stall at 80%. RAG systems, document processing, content pipelines, and LLM features that ship in weeks and hold up once real users hit them.

What is generative AI development?

Generative AI development is the work of building product features powered by models that produce new output (text, structured data, summaries, code, images) rather than only classifying or retrieving what already exists. In practice it means wiring a model into your product so it does something useful with your data, reliably, at a cost you can predict.

The model call is the easy part. Everything around it is the work: getting the right context in front of the model, measuring whether the output is actually good, catching the cases where it isn't, and keeping token costs from quietly tripling. Codroon builds that surrounding layer of retrieval, evaluation, guardrails, caching, and monitoring. It's the difference between a demo that impresses and a feature that survives contact with users.

RAG vs fine-tuning vs prompt engineering: which one you actually need

Almost every generative AI project starts with this decision, and most teams reach for the expensive option first. Here's the honest comparison.

RAG vs fine-tuning vs prompt engineering: which one you actually need
Comparison pointRAGFine-tuningPrompt engineering
What it changesWhat the model knowsHow the model behavesWhat the model is asked
Best forAnswering from your own docs and dataConsistent format, tone, or one narrow taskAlmost everything. Try this first
Setup costModerateHighLow
Cost to updateAdd a documentRetrain the modelEdit text
Data you needContent you already haveHundreds to thousands of examplesNone
Common mistakeBuilding it before trying promptingReaching for it far too earlyStopping here when retrieval was the answer

Most projects need good prompting plus retrieval. Fine-tuning is right roughly one time in ten, and usually not at the start. We'll tell you which bucket you're in before you spend anything.

Our generative AI development services

Codroon builds four kinds of generative AI work. Most projects combine the first two.

  • LLM Feature Development

    AI features inside your existing product: summarisation, drafting, search, classification, structured extraction. Built to your stack, with cost and latency budgets set before we write anything.

  • RAG & Knowledge Systems

    Retrieval systems that let a model answer from your own documents, tickets, or database instead of guessing. Chunking, embedding, reranking, and the citation layer that lets a user check the answer.

  • Document & Data Extraction

    Turning unstructured input (PDFs, invoices, emails, contracts, scanned forms) into structured data your systems can use. Schema-validated output with confidence scores, not free text you have to parse again.

  • Evaluation & Model Optimization

    Eval harnesses, prompt tuning, model selection, and caching. Usually the cheapest work with the biggest effect, because most teams are paying frontier prices for a task a smaller model handles just as well.

How Codroon builds a generative AI feature

Four steps, two to five weeks, and evaluation starts before the build does.

  1. Discovery and feasibility

    Free, 45 minutes

    We look at what you want the feature to do and whether your data supports it yet. Sometimes it doesn't, and that's worth knowing in 45 minutes rather than four weeks. You leave with a written scope, a recommended approach, and a real number, yours to keep either way.

    • written scope
    • recommended approach
    • fixed price and timeline
  2. Prototype and eval baseline

    Week 1

    We build a rough version and, more importantly, the test set that tells us whether it's working. Generative output is subjective until you measure it, so we agree on what “good” means, in numbers, before tuning anything.

    • working prototype
    • eval set and baseline scores
    • cost-per-run estimate
  3. Build and tune

    Weeks 2–4

    Retrieval, prompts, guardrails, and fallbacks, tuned against the eval set each iteration. Every change gets measured, so improvements are demonstrated rather than asserted. You see output on your real data weekly.

    • production feature
    • eval scores across versions
    • guardrail spec
  4. Ship and measure

    Weeks 4–5

    We deploy into your stack, wire up tracing and cost monitoring, and hand over the repository with documentation. You own all of it, including the eval suite. That's what lets your team keep improving it without us.

    • production deployment
    • observability and cost dashboard
    • repo and docs

The stack Codroon builds generative AI on

We pick the right tools, not the trendy ones. Here's what we run in 2026 and why.

Models
Claude, GPT, and Gemini for frontier work. Open models like Llama, Qwen, and Mistral, served through vLLM or Groq where cost, latency, or data residency makes that the better call. We benchmark on your task rather than assuming.
Retrieval
pgvector when you're already on Postgres and shouldn't pay for a second database. Pinecone or Qdrant when scale or filtering demands a dedicated one. Reranking on top where recall matters more than speed.
Frameworks
LlamaIndex Workflows for document-heavy and event-driven pipelines. LangChain where the ecosystem saves real time. Vercel AI SDK for streaming interfaces. Pydantic AI where output has to be type-safe and validated.
Evaluation and observability
Langfuse and LangSmith for tracing and evals, OpenTelemetry underneath. A generative feature without an eval suite is one you can't improve on purpose. You can only change it and hope.
Infrastructure
AWS, Docker, Vercel, Python, TypeScript, and PostgreSQL. Boring where boring is correct.

Where generative AI development pays off fastest

Codroon builds generative AI features across four areas where there's a lot of unstructured text and not enough people to read it.

In-app summarisation, semantic search, drafting, and onboarding. Usually the fastest measurable win, because the data is already structured and the surface to put a feature on already exists.

Product descriptions at catalogue scale, review synthesis, support deflection, and merchandising copy. High volume, repetitive, and every item slightly different, which is exactly the shape this work suits.

Research assistance, editing support, repurposing across formats, and archive search. Retrieval matters more than generation here. The value is in finding the right source, not inventing one.

Contract review, document intake, report drafting, and knowledge search across years of files. Document-heavy work where extraction accuracy and citations matter more than fluency.

What generative AI development costs

Most generative AI projects with Codroon run $6,000–$30,000 and take two to five weeks. A single feature on clean data sits at the lower end. A RAG system across multiple sources with evaluation and human review sits at the upper.

We quote a fixed price after the discovery call. And if prompting alone solves your problem, we'll say so. That's a cheaper engagement and we'd rather have the honest conversation than sell you a retrieval system you didn't need.

Price your build in about three minutes with the AI cost calculator, including what it costs to run each month.

Generative AI development: common questions

Most generative AI projects take two to five weeks and cost $6,000–$30,000. Most teams need prompting plus retrieval, not fine-tuning. You own the code and the eval suite outright, and the discovery call is free.

Usually neither, at first. Good prompting solves more than people expect. When it doesn't, retrieval is the next step: cheaper to build, cheaper to update, and you add knowledge by adding a document rather than retraining. Fine-tuning is right when you need consistent format or tone on a narrow task, and it's the correct answer maybe one time in ten.

Any model can produce something confident and wrong. The engineering answer is to constrain it: ground answers in retrieved sources, cite what it used so a person can verify, validate output against a schema, and route low-confidence cases to a human. You reduce it to a manageable rate and design for the rest. Anyone promising zero is selling something.

Not on the API tiers we build on. Anthropic, OpenAI, and Google all offer business terms where inputs and outputs aren't used for training, and that's what we deploy against. If your requirements are stricter, we can run open models on your own infrastructure instead.

We build an eval set before tuning anything (real examples from your data with agreed-correct answers) and score every version against it. That turns “this feels better” into a number. Codroon hands the eval suite over with the code, so your team can keep measuring after we're gone.

Yes, and that's most of this work. We integrate into your existing stack rather than asking you to migrate. The main scoping question is how your data is stored and whether it's reachable, not what framework you're on.

We build model-agnostic wherever possible, so swapping is a config change and a re-run of the eval suite rather than a rewrite. This matters more than it sounds. Model pricing and capability shift every few months, and you shouldn't be locked to a decision made in week one.

$6,000–$30,000 for most projects, quoted as a fixed price after the discovery call. Codroon doesn't bill hourly. You get a number and a date, and we hold both.

Let's find out what your data can actually support

Forty-five minutes, no prep, no commitment. Tell us what you want the feature to do and you'll leave with a scope, a recommended approach, and a real number, even if you build it somewhere else.